The human review layer for AI-generated work

Your AI scaled. Now your review keeps up.

Mairit plugs into your agent and routes AI work to a qualified human reviewer before it ships. Internal experts first. Curated specialists when you need them. Minutes, not hours.

Request a pilot See how it works

Works inside the agents your teams already use

Claude Cursor ChatGPT Lovable OpenClaw Any MCP agent
Claude — vendor-contract-v2.md
/review
mairit Detected: commercial contract — 3 qualified reviewers available.
1
Priya Nair · Legal (internal) 47 similar reviews · available now
~25 min
2
David Chen · Legal (internal) 12 similar reviews · backlog 2h
~35 min
3
SaaS commercial attorney (external) Mairit network · $240
~30 min
mairit Sending to Priya. Review will return here attested and ready to ship.

AI is producing work faster than anyone can verify it.

You deployed AI across your teams this year. You also deployed a problem nobody told you about.

AI output is up 10x. Review capacity isn't.

Contracts, code, memos, analyses — drafted in minutes. Reviewed in hours, if at all. Most of your AI work ships unchecked or doesn't ship.

Your senior people are the bottleneck. They know it.

The staff engineer reviewing PRs at 11pm. The senior counsel checking contracts on weekends. The principal analyst catching errors nobody else would. They're burning out.

Your policy says "senior review required." Nobody can prove it happened.

The audit trail is Slack DMs and email threads. Compliance is uneasy. Legal is uneasy. Your board is starting to ask questions you can't answer.

The review gate, inside your agent.

One command. The right reviewer. Reviewed output back in minutes. No new tabs, no chasing, no escalation threads.

1

AI finishes the work

A contract. Some code. A memo. Something that would normally sit in your drafts folder waiting for a senior signoff.

› claude finished drafting
  vendor-contract.md
2

One command invokes Mairit

Type /review. Mairit reads the work, identifies the domain, and surfaces the two or three people best placed to check it.

› /review
  3 reviewers matched
3

A qualified human reviews

Your internal expert by default. A vetted specialist from our network when nobody inside fits. Structured rubric. No essays.

› priya.nair
  reviewing · 12 of 15
4

Back in your agent, attested

Reviewed output returns inline. Cryptographically signed. Audit-logged. Ready to ship with a record that holds up to compliance.

› review complete
  attested · ready to ship
<60min
from review request to signed, attested output
more AI work reviewed without adding headcount
100%
audit-logged, signed, and ready for compliance

What shipping AI work looks like today vs. with Mairit.

Same AI-drafted contract. Two very different outcomes.

Today
Ship it unreviewed. Hope for the best.
Or spend 90 minutes reviewing it yourself.
Or Slack legal. Wait three days.
Or pay outside counsel $1,500. Wait a week.
With Mairit
Type /review. Pick a reviewer.
25 minutes later, reviewed in your agent.
Attorney's sign-off, cryptographically attested.
Full audit trail. Compliance happy.

Built for the enterprise AI stack.

MCP-native. Directory-aware. Attested. The review infrastructure your governance team has been asking for.

Routing

Your people first. Our network when yours isn't right.

Mairit reads your directory and knows which of your senior people are qualified for what. They're the default reviewers. When nobody internal fits, or they're not available, Mairit falls back to a curated external specialist network you don't have to manage.

Integrates with your directory — no new identity system to maintain Matching explained, not black-boxed — you always see why 30–50 vetted external specialists across launch domains
Reviewer options for this contract
Priya Nair
Senior commercial counsel · 47 similar
INTERNAL
David Chen
Staff attorney · 12 similar
INTERNAL
SaaS commercial specialist
Mairit network · 220+ reviews
EXTERNAL
Rubrics

Structured checks. Not free-form essays.

Reviewers don't write three paragraphs of prose. They answer a rubric built for the specific document type — 15 questions for a commercial contract, 12 for a code review, 10 for a strategic memo. Faster for them. Consistent for you. Synthesizable across reviews.

Rubrics designed with domain experts in legal, engineering, and strategy Review time typically 20–30 minutes — not 2 hours Free-text notes stay where judgment actually needs them
Commercial contract rubric
Indemnification scope
Liability cap reasonable
Data usage clause
Termination terms
Pricing / auto-renewal
Attestation

Every review, signed. Every action, logged.

When a reviewer attests, it's cryptographically bound to their identity and timestamped. Every material action produces an immutable audit record. When compliance asks who reviewed what and when, you export the answer in one click.

Cryptographic attestation tied to a named, verified reviewer Tamper-evident audit log, CSV and JSON export SOC 2 Type I in process. Type II target year 2.
Audit record · review #4821
Reviewer verified · signed
priya.nair@contentflow.com
Ed25519 · 2026-04-18 14:32Z
Review rubric commercial-contract-v2.1
15 questions · 2 flags raised · 1 non-standard clause
✓ Attested. Ready to ship.

Three domains at launch. The ones where getting it wrong hurts most.

Commercial contracts. Production code. Strategic memos. The work that needs senior sign-off before it leaves the building.

Sample review · MSA with data vendor
⚠ Flag — indemnification clause unusually broad. Negotiate carve-out for third-party IP claims.
Note — liability cap at 12mo fees is market-standard. Acceptable.
✓ Approved — with negotiation points flagged above.

The contract every PM drafts. The one every attorney reviews.

Your PMs and sales teams use AI to draft NDAs, SOWs, vendor contracts, DPAs. Today those pile up in legal's inbox. With Mairit, each one routes to a qualified attorney — yours or ours — who runs a structured review in under 30 minutes. Non-standard clauses flagged. Market-standard terms approved. Shipped with an audit trail.

NDAs, MSAs, SOWs, DPAs, vendor contracts under $500K Attorney sign-off in minutes, not days Flat-rate review pricing. No hourly billing games.
Request a pilot
Sample review · auth.ts diff, 84 lines
⚠ Security — JWT signing key loaded from env without validation. Add fail-fast check.
Note — error handling catches too broadly. Narrow to expected exceptions.
✓ Approved — after security fix and narrower catch.

Your staff engineers aren't a PR review service.

Your teams ship AI-generated code daily. Most of it is fine. The 5% that isn't causes production incidents your staff engineers end up debugging anyway. Mairit routes high-stakes changes — auth, payments, data migrations — to a senior engineer for structured review before merge. They review what needs them. They stop reviewing everything else.

Production deploys, critical paths, security-sensitive changes Reviews against your own engineering standards — not generic rubrics Works with Cursor, Claude Code, and any MCP coding agent
Request a pilot
Sample review · Q3 market entry memo
⚠ Analysis gap — TAM calculation assumes 100% conversion. Sensitivity analysis needed.
Note — competitive framing is strong. Specific on differentiation.
✓ Approved — revise TAM section, then ready for leadership.

AI gives you the draft. A senior catches what it missed.

Strategy memos, market analyses, investment cases — AI writes a credible draft. What it can't do is pattern-match against fifty similar analyses the way a senior strategist can. Mairit connects you to someone who's seen the shape of this argument before, catches the TAM assumption that doesn't hold, and sharpens the narrative before it reaches leadership.

Board-bound memos, strategic analyses, investment cases Senior strategists and domain specialists, not generalists Your internal principal analysts stop being the bottleneck
Request a pilot

Built for the data your teams actually produce.

Contracts, code, strategy memos, compensation decisions. Sensitive by default. Mairit treats it that way from day one.

SOC 2 Type I In process · Type II year 2
Encryption in place AES-256 at rest · TLS 1.3 in transit
No training use, ever Your data is never used to train models
Reviewer access scoped Per review only · PII redaction option

The review layer for AI-generated work. Now in pilot.

Early access is open to a handful of mid-market teams deploying AI at scale. Three launch domains. Your internal experts. Live in weeks.

Request a pilot See the product