Mairit plugs into the AI your legal team already uses and routes vendor contracts, NDAs, MSAs, and amendments to a qualified lawyer before they're signed. In-house counsel first. Vetted external when nobody inside fits. Audit trail that holds up to SRA, the Bar, and your malpractice insurer.
Your legal team rolled out AI contract review this year. Your business teams use it too. Most contracts get an AI redline before a lawyer ever sees them. Some never get a lawyer at all.
NDAs marked up by ChatGPT. Vendor contracts redlined by Spellbook. MSAs analysed by Claude. Reviewed in minutes. Signed in hours. Litigated in years when the indemnity carve-out turns out to mean what the AI said it didn't.
The senior counsel catching the missed indemnity. The GC noticing the AI rewrote 'shall' as 'may.' The contracts manager who realises the AI accepted a liability cap that triples the firm's exposure. The volume just doesn't fit the calendar. The contracts they should review in depth, they skim. The ones they should skim, they sign.
SRA Standards & Regulations require qualified solicitor competence and supervision. ABA Model Rule 5.3 requires lawyers to make reasonable efforts to ensure non-lawyer assistance (including AI) is properly supervised. Right now, your evidence of qualified review is a paralegal's note that the AI 'looked fine.' That's not going to hold up. Not to a regulator, not to your malpractice insurer.
One command. The right reviewer. Reviewed contract back in minutes. No more chasing senior counsel in Slack, no more sign-offs at 11pm, no more discovery surprises.
An AI-redlined NDA. A counterparty's MSA markup. A vendor contract amendment. Something that would normally sit in a queue waiting for a senior signoff that may never come.
Type /review. Mairit reads the work, identifies the domain, and surfaces the two or three people best placed to check it.
Your in-house counsel by default. A vetted external lawyer from our network when nobody inside fits. Structured rubric. Risk allocation, indemnity, liability, term. No essays.
Reviewed contract returns inline. Cryptographically signed by a qualified lawyer. Audit-logged. Privilege-aware. Ready to sign with a record that holds up to regulators, malpractice insurers, and opposing counsel.
Same vendor MSA, two paths. One ends at signature. The other ends at deposition.
MSAs and vendor contracts. NDAs and DPAs. Amendments and SOWs. The contract work that needs qualified lawyer sign-off before it's signed.
Your business teams use AI to redline vendor MSAs, mark up SOWs, and accept counterparty amendments. Today legal catches the worst ones at renewal, after the firm's been bound for a year. With Mairit, every AI-redlined commercial contract routes to a qualified lawyer for a risk allocation check before signature. Indemnity carve-outs flagged. Liability caps benchmarked. Termination triggers verified. Signed with an audit trail your GC can put in front of an insurer.
Your business teams sign NDAs and DPAs by the dozen. Most go through AI review only. Most never see a lawyer. Most are fine. Some aren't. Mairit puts a qualified reviewer in the loop for every NDA and DPA, with a 10-minute structured check that catches non-standard mutuality clauses, unusual jurisdiction picks, and data-processing terms that won't survive a GDPR audit.
Mid-term amendments. Quarterly SOWs. Schedule changes. Each one looks small. Each one shifts the risk allocation a little. AI is great at processing them, terrible at noticing the cumulative drift. Mairit routes every amendment to a lawyer who has the original contract and all prior amendments at hand, with a structured check on cumulative risk and any term that's quietly migrated.
MCP-native. Directory-aware. Attested. Built for the work your team actually produces.
Mairit reads your legal directory and knows which of your lawyers are qualified for what motion, what jurisdiction, and what subject matter. They're the default reviewers. When nobody internal fits, or they're not available, Mairit falls back to a curated network of qualified lawyers (SRA, NY Bar, CA Bar, EU bars) you don't have to manage.
Reviewers don't write three paragraphs of advice. They answer a rubric built for the specific motion. 16 questions for an MSA. 12 for an NDA. 14 for an amendment. Faster for them. Consistent across the team. Defensible at audit.
When a qualified lawyer attests, it's cryptographically bound to their identity, their bar admission, and the timestamp. Every material action produces an immutable audit record. When your GC, your malpractice insurer, or a regulator asks who reviewed what and when, you export the answer in one click. In a format that maps to SRA supervision rules, ABA Model Rule 5.3, and your insurer's diligence requirements.
MSAs. NDAs. DPAs. Amendments. SOWs. Privileged, supervised, insurer-watched. Mairit treats it that way from day one.
Solicitor competence and supervision evidence captured per SRA Standards & Regulations. Defensible at SRA audit.
Reasonable supervision of non-lawyer (and AI) assistance. Evidence of qualified-lawyer review for every contract.
Privileged document handling. Reviewer notes protected as attorney-client work product. No model training.
Diligence-trail evidence in the format your professional indemnity insurer asks for at renewal.
DPA-specific compliance checks. Cross-border data transfer controls. Special-category handling defaults applied.
One-click export of contract, review, attestation, and lawyer credentials in regulator-preferred format.
Type I in audit. Type II target year 2.
AES-256 at rest. TLS 1.3 in transit.
Your privileged documents are never used to train models.
Per-matter only. Privileged-document handling default-on.
Pick one motion. Plug into the AI your legal team already uses. See whether qualified human review at machine speed actually changes how your legal function operates.
GCs and Heads of Legal who'd rather have the supervision trail in place before the malpractice insurer asks for it.
Contracts get litigated three years after they're signed. The supervision evidence you didn't capture in 2026 is the evidence you wish you had in 2029.